SPIRITUALITY, FAIR TRADE AND SOCIAL JUSTICE
23
October
2013

Blog #7: The Story of Stuff

Text 1: In our current economic system, we are considered to be "valueless" if we do not own or purchase a lot of stuff. When I heard this quote I immediately thought back to my Catholic Education and remembered how God warned us to not commit idolatry. I am referring here to the worship/infatuation with materialistic items that give us "value" in our current economic system.

Response 1: Well, it seems like we dropped the ball on this one. We fail miserably every day to adhere to one of God's most primitive guidelines for humanity. We are glued to our iPhone, constantly reverberating our ear drums with our headphones, incessantly e-mailing, and then heading home to our LCD televisions and overhead showers. The value has shifted from the now idealistic, intrinsic value that a human has, to the superficiality of the measure of how much "stuff" a human can obtain. And our consumption is only increasing at the video states. Hopefully we hit a roadblock soon that will slow us down and shift the focus back to what it should be.

Text 2: The quote from Victor Lebow disturbed me. Lebow said we have to live to consume at an ever-accelerating rate. Are we really supposed to make consumption our way of life? Have humans evolved into such a transitory species that we have to practice such rituals to live?

Response 2: Unfortunately, our economy has harvested this way of life. Especially living in New York, where I most recently bought a small glass of Lemonade at the Columbus Circle Mall for $4.08. When the cashier told me the total I almost did a double-take. I have seen meals at a diner cost less than $4.08. That's what NYC is today. In order to make it here, you've got to spend it here. The economy has transformed itself into an ever-consuming money pit that needs constant contributions to stimulate itself. It really says something about inflation and the nation's debt when I'm spending over 4 dollars for a SMALL glass of lemonade. I didn't even look at what a large would have costed. All I know is, I'm moving down South where the sun is shining and a small glass of lemonade is affordable.

Write comment now Author: Rdoyle5 Wed Oct 23, 2013 1:57 am
23
October
2013

Story of Stuff

Video Text

1. I thought that this video had a lot of interesting facts that I didn't know about beforehand. One of the statistics that really stood out to me was "if everyone consumed like the U.S. then there would need to be an additional 3-5 planets." These 3-5 planets would need to be sustainable to live on like Earth.

2. Another statistic I found interesting in the video was that the smallest members of society (babies) are the ones with the most exposure to harmful toxins through breast milk and nursing from their mother.

Responses

1. This statistic is truly mind boggling because the 1 planet is already harmed by toxins and pollution, so I can't even imaging what would happen if there were an additional 3-5. Annie Leonard also mentioned in the video that today we are constantly identified as consumers, not mothers, children, etc. This a scary, but truthful statement because as a society we are in this "work, watch, spend treadmill." We are working harder than ever before, but when the workday is over we like to come home and watch TV and when we are feeling low, we like to shop. However, when we shop we are not thinking about where the material items are going , and therefore the items end up in the trash a few years after purchasing them. Also, I related to Annie Leonard's example of the "fat heel in a skinny heel world" because I am extremely interested in fashion and try to keep up with the latest trends, even if that means wearing an item I probably owned and threw out 5 years ago.


2. I found this statistic shocking because breast feeding a baby is supposed to be not only a maternal gift, but is also supposed to the improve the health of the baby. The fact that newborns are being exposed to such harmful chemicals and toxins through a natural process is saddening. It is is taking a beautiful and natural thing and turning it into something that people look down upon. I think as a society we need to be more conscious about where our materials are going because as the video shows, our trash comes back to haunt us. We cannot expect to just dump our trash in landfills and incinerators without any consequences.

Write comment now Authorin: Alexa Mancuso Wed Oct 23, 2013 1:29 am
23
October
2013

The Story of Stuff and The Story of Change

Text 1: "In the past three decades 1/3 of the worlds total natural resources have been consumed."

Response: I was astounded by this statistic. I never knew we have wasted so many of our limited resources, and it's quite scary to think about. To put it in perspective that means out of the thousands of years man has been roaming the Earth and the billions of years that most of these resources have been available, in just the last 30 years, less than 1/3 the lifespan of a human in this day and age, 33% of it is gone. So someone born 30 years could very well see the entire depletion of all the Earth's natural resources in one lifetime. That is incredible and presses the need for research in renewable alternative energy.

Text 2: "Faith is taking the first step even though you do not see the whole staircase."

Response 2: I found this quote to be really powerful and completely true. Faith, by definition, is trusting in something you can't see or are not sure of. Therefore it takes a powerful person to have faith and it's a journey you undertake where the end is completely in the dark.

Write comment now Author: Jeff Wed Oct 23, 2013 1:22 am
22
October
2013

Blog Post 7:

Text 1: "If you don't buy or own a lot of stuff, you don't have value." This quote stuck out to me because of how true it is in modern day.

Response: It is really sad to think that the world has become a place where anything of value has a price tag on it. It is really sad to think that so many people put faith in material things instead of their families or friends. I think in this day and age to many people forget about the more important things in life. We are too focus on our plans, our silly little plans, where we try to run our lives and the lives of people around us. Just take a step back and look at how integrated your life has become with money. Without it we can barely do anything, and yet with it we also can barely do anything. It is sad to thing that value has become so synonymous to wealth in this day and age. I personally love wealth, and the benefits that come with it. However, i do not believe that wealth is in anyway equal to value. Value is something completely and utterly different. Value is the importance of something to someone. Something of value is something that has ties with you. Something that is worth fighting, and dying for. Something that is worth all your time and effort. And sure this could be money, but it is also a whole lot of other things.

Text 2: “6 months after their date of sale only 1% of products are still in use… 99% of materials are trashed within 6 months.” This quote was not surprising at all, and it made me reflect on my own actions.

Response: Barely surprising, but realizing that you see these qualities in yourself is the real value of this quote. After looking at this quote in depth i realized how much of a wasteful person i am. I throw away good food, decent clothing, and a plethora of other things just because i know i have the money to get me more things. That is utterly disgusting. How can i throw away perfectly good food when other people around the globe are starving. Ignorance. I mean ignorance is bliss right? However, it is blatantly scary how easily it is to forget about the world around you when you are living in your own tiny little bubble. This statistic is saddening and even worse when you realize you waste just as much perfectly good resources as well.

Write comment now Author: anguyen16 Tue Oct 22, 2013 11:09 pm
22
October
2013

Oct 22nd: The Story of Stuff

-This video is full of statistics, and has facts about the United States and the world that are very easy to follow. She says things like “The US uses 30% of world resources and only 5% of population,” and that we would need 3 to 5 plants if everyone consumed at the same rate as the United States. Another fact is that “four billion pounds of toxic chemicals a year from the United States.”
-The amount of fact and statistics is something I really liked about this video. It allowed me to see how real everything is by the use of actual numbers. The facts are definitely things I was unaware of, and I liked being able to get this information in such an interesting way. I especially liked the fact about the resources used in the United States and the amount of planets that would be needed. It shows just how much we use, how much more we use than other countries, and that we should probably cut back on the amount we use.
-There is a part where she gives a stat about babies getting the highest dose of toxins from breast-feeding, but then goes on to say that “breast feeding is still best, and we should definitely keep breast-feeding.”
-This quote kind of confuses me. She states that breast-feeding is bad for children and it gives them many toxins. Breast-feeding apparently gives so many that babies have the highest amounts of toxins from their mother. She says it should be safe, which I agree with but I don’t really understand her next point. After stating how bad it is for the babies she still says it is best and should continue. I just don’t understand how that correlates, and how it can be fixed. I know that she believes the government should fix the issue, but I don’t know how since it is such a big change.

Write comment now Authorin: vmcal Tue Oct 22, 2013 9:07 am
22
October
2013

Story of Stuff and Ethical Objections to FT

Points that stood Out
1) We have created 100,000 new synthetic chemicals that factories have created through production process of materials to make "better" and "safer" goods for us as end consumers.

2) What happens to factory works who are being taken advantage of or who are not fair trade? Will they suffer more when they are in less demand?

My interpretation
1) This fact about 100,000 man made chemicals that have been created through processing materials, chemicals, and toxins is frightening. These are chemicals that have not all been test as safe to the environment and to humans. The thought is that they are put into the air and are diluted. The issue is that there are many chemicals that are not proven to be safe or unsafe. But when these chemicals interact with the other thousands of created chemicals there is a probability that some of them will be dangerous to us. This was one of the most eye opening facts in this video that focused on sustainability of our economic system.

2) Is fair trade the best way? Can everyone at the bottom end of the spectrum survive in this system? Or will some suffer while those in fair trade benefit from better conditions? Some of the arguements will argue along the similar lines of public education and the voucher program, which is famous in DC. The program allows for some students the money to go to a private school who would normally not have the chance. The connection I see to fair trade is that only some benefit while a large amount still suffer from big corporations taking advantage of them (or public school students still have to go to bad public schools). Another relation is that the few in fair trade (and with vouchers) benefit alot but those not classified as fair trade are hurt even worse. There needs to be a way to bring everyone up. That needs to be the goal.

Write comment now Author: jtreseler1 Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:47 am
22
October
2013

The Story of Stuff & The Story of Change

Text 1: "I didn't choose a world in which some people can afford to live green, leaving the rest of us to be irresponsible planet wreckers"

Response: I really enjoyed this video because of the message Annie Leonard got across about consumerism. This part of the video particularly caught my attention when there was a mock picture of "Whole Paycheck". I am a big fan of Whole Foods, and have heard it been called Whole Paycheck many times. I usually took it as a joke, but now it's' interesting to see that society does in fact make it hard for most people to consume responsibly and environmentally conscious. As the nick name implies, stores like Whole Foods are pricey and make it difficult for people to regularly buy from. I like how Annie Leonard highlights how the source of the problem is at the corrupt and failed government policies, and that the solution is through joint effort of citizens petitioning to change government policies.

Text 2: "Big idea + WE (commitment to work together) + Action = Change"

I really love how interactive and creative this video was. Even though Annie Leonard is using this to be apply to making environmental and social changes in the market, I feel like I can apply this to anything. This is the basis of how change works. She used Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. as examples of how change may have seen impossible, but with these elements they are very much attainable. Especially in today's world where we can connect so easily with technology, social change, for example promoting more Fair Trade, is possible. I think we can apply these principles to promoting Fair Trade in our country and around the world.

Write comment now Authorin: lmcgowan2 Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:40 am
22
October
2013

Blog #7 – 10/22/13

Text 1:

“6 months after their date of sale only 1% of products are still in use… 99% of materials are trashed within 6 months.”

Response 1:

When I heard this I paused the video. That is a disgusting statistic. It made me think that all of this is for nothing. It makes me feel piggish. So we are ruining the world, the atmosphere, the natural resources, land, etc. just so that we can consume and dispose within 6 months? That’s insane. I wonder how much of that statistic involves things that are meant to have a short life span, such as household items like toothpaste, paper towels, etc. compared to things that should never really be thrown out, like clothing, shoes, furniture, etc. If the statistic involves much of the latter, I wonder why. Do that many people really throw out tangible items instead of donating or selling them? To be honest, I am skeptical of the validity of this statistic.

Text 2:
Planned obsolescence: designing and producing products in order for them to be used up (obsolete) within a specific time period. Products may be designed for obsolescence either through function, like a paper coffee cup or a machine with breakable parts, or through “desirability,” like a piece of clothing made for this year’s fashion and then replaced by something totally different next year. Planned obsolescence is also known as “design for the dump.”
Perceived obsolescence: the part of planned obsolescence that refers to “desirability”. In other words, an object may continue to be functional, but it is no longer perceived to be stylish or appropriate, so it is rendered obsolete by perception, rather than by function. Fashion is all about perceived obsolescence, and it could be said that perceived obsolescence is the number one “product” of the advertising industry.
Response 2:

In a way, I appreciate how innovative many companies are. I appreciate that they are able to come up with new and/or improved technologies so quickly. However, much of that appreciation comes from my skewed perception of innovation and improvement. How much are companies actually improving their products compared to how much they are using technology to either make products obsolete after a certain period of time or convince us that they are?

Write comment now Authorin: ninajanel Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:07 am
22
October
2013

Week of October 20th

The Story of Stuff

“Planned obsolesce is how fast can you make something break that leaves consumers faithful enough to buy a replacement and perceived obsolesce is when the look of products are changes so that consumers feel the need to buy new to keep up with society.”

When this was mentioned in the video, I began to think about how true this statement was. I have never really thought about how often it becomes necessary to replace the things we have. I feel like the iPhone is the perfect example of a product with perceived obsolesce. A new iPhone is introduced roughly every 6 months to one year. While there are some advances in the technology of a phone, a previous model of an iPhone does not stop working; consumers simply feel the need to keep upgrading to keep up with the new advancements. As crazy as it sounds to buy something new when we currently own essentially the exact same product, many of us can agree that when you are sitting in the Fordham cafeteria with an iPhone 4, you feel a bit out of place. The list of example to prove these two ideas seems endless.

The Story of Broke

“Money from our taxes goes to oil companies and big bank bailouts but not to build a better future”

A majority of this video focused on the issues with our government and how taxes are spent. Like The Story of Stuff, I never thought about any of these issues until they were presented in the video. The government is able to pay for things like bailouts and offer subsidiaries to big corporations but there always seems to be concerns about paying for schools and having enough for social security and medicare. While I would like to think the government is always mindful of the best interests of its people, I think about my high school and wonder why there was such a struggle for resources in a public school. This really made me think, where are all the taxes we pay actually going?

Ethical Objections to Fair Trade

“Pre-announced visit by Fairtrade accountant every 5-6 years is not likely to pick up non-compliance”
“Fairtrade monitors the price paid to exporters. It doesn’t control what happens to the money nor does it monitor how much reaches the farmer.”

I thought this article brought up a point of view that should be considered when thinking about the goals and practices of Fair Trade. If there are people who still have the questions and doubts like the author of this article, how can we prove to them that Fair Trade is doing something good? How can we continue to make Fair Trade more transparent? I think that this article could be used to help improve Fair Trade and make changes to help expand the idea.

Write comment now Authorin: Shannon McKenna Tue Oct 22, 2013 6:39 am
21
October
2013

The Story of Stuff & The Story of Change

The Story of Stuff:
I was extremely surprised by the stats used in the video. I never knew that 40% of the waterways in the US have become undrinkable. That makes me wonder about the states in the midwest and south that are more likely to experience a drought. If 40% of the waterways are undrinkable, then how do people in those areas get water? I was also surprised by the fact that 80% of the planet's forests are gone. 80% is a huge number and with that much of forest being gone, very little is left. Trees are vital for the ecosystem and help to filter out the carbon dioxide in the air. It would help reduce the carbon in the air if they were more trees, even if it was a small percentage. I never would have expected it to be 80% gone because there are countries that value their environment and countries where there are many trees prevalent. I was most startled by breast milk having the most toxins. I knew that what we consume would be transferred on to our babies but I never thought about it being through breast milk. I always thought it would be the purest thing that a baby could consume. But this video has made me realize that even breast milk is harmful.

I agreed with the point in the video: "If you don't buy or own a lot of stuff, you don't have value." In society now, everyone watches what you own when they judge you and determine whether you can fit in with them. It has become all about what material possessions you have and you're cast out if you aren't up to spend with the latest products. The appeal of the products can be blamed for this. The advancement in technology has caused people to want to get the new thing because it's cool and they want to experience the change it has on the world. It's a smart way to get business, on the part of the producer, but a stupid decision on part of the consumer. However, consumers can't be blamed completely because of the ads and media that make these products so appealing. Shopping also takes up our time and is viewed as a wonderful pastime (as how I see it, even though I end up wasting my money), but it only benefits producers which doesn't do consumers any good because they already have millions of dollars. If the money was going to a fair trade entrepreneur I would say that would be a better way to spend money because at least a poor artisan can buy food for their family another day. They have a way to survive.

The Story of Change:
I didn't really see much in this video besides the stats. I never would have expected such a high percentage of Americans want better laws for the environment and energy when they waste so much. I think the best way to help the environment is not to rely on laws, but to rely on yourself to the do the right thing and save what you can when you can. I was amazed to see "83% of Americans want clean energy laws" when they themselves are probably wasting energy. It just seems to me like they're hypocrites. However, this is my own assumption and I'm not speaking from facts when I say they're hypocrites.

I did like the equation for change that was shown.
Big idea + WE + ACTION = Change
Yes it does and will take a long time to achieve change but at least its a start. According to the stats, a lot of people already want change, now all they have to do is come together. I don't think they need to do so physically but they can do it in the sense that they change their daily lives to save energy. Together, that would help greatly.

Write comment now Authorin: fanezaj Mon Oct 21, 2013 8:18 am
21
October
2013

The Story of Stuff &

The Story of Stuff:
I was extremely surprised by the stats used in the video. I never knew that 40% of the waterways in the US have become undrinkable. That makes me wonder about the states in the midwest and south that are more likely to experience a drought. If 40% of the waterways are undrinkable, then how do people in those areas get water? I was also surprised by the fact that 80% of the planet's forests are gone. 80% is a huge number and with that much of forest being gone, very little is left. Trees are vital for the ecosystem and help to filter out the carbon dioxide in the air. It would help reduce the carbon in the air if they were more trees, even if it was a small percentage. I never would have expected it to be 80% gone because there are countries that value their environment and countries where there are many trees prevalent. I was most startled by breast milk having the most toxins. I knew that what we consume would be transferred on to our babies but I never thought about it being through breast milk. I always thought it would be the purest thing that a baby could consume. But this video has made me realize that even breast milk is harmful.

I agreed with the point in the video: "If you don't buy or own a lot of stuff, you don't have value." In society now, everyone watches what you own when they judge you and determine whether you can fit in with them. It has become all about what material possessions you have and you're cast out if you aren't up to spend with the latest products. The appeal of the products can be blamed for this. The advancement in technology has caused people to want to get the new thing because it's cool and they want to experience the change it has on the world. It's a smart way to get business, on the part of the producer, but a stupid decision on part of the consumer. However, consumers can't be blamed completely because of the ads and media that make these products so appealing. Shopping also takes up our time and is viewed as a wonderful pastime (as how I see it, even though I end up wasting my money), but it only benefits producers which doesn't do consumers any good because they already have millions of dollars. If the money was going to a fair trade entrepreneur I would say that would be a better way to spend money because at least a poor artisan can buy food for their family another day. They have a way to survive.

The Story of Change:
I didn't really see much in this video besides the stats. I never would have expected such a high percentage of Americans want better laws for the environment and energy when they waste so much. I think the best way to help the environment is not to rely on laws, but to rely on yourself to the do the right thing and save what you can when you can. I was amazed to see "83% of Americans want clean energy laws" when they themselves are probably wasting energy. It just seems to me like they're hypocrites. However, this is my own assumption and I'm not speaking from facts when I say they're hypocrites.

I did like the equation for change that was shown.
Big idea + WE + ACTION = Change
Yes it does and will take a long time to achieve change but at least its a start. According to the stats, a lot of people already want change, now all they have to do is come together. I don't think they need to do so physically but they can do it in the sense that they change their daily lives to save energy. Together, that would help greatly.

Write comment now Authorin: fanezaj Mon Oct 21, 2013 8:18 am
21
October
2013

The Story of Stuff & The Story of Change

Actual Text #1: The past three decades “1/3 of the worlds total natural resources have been consumed. 80 percent of the world’s forests are gone and 99% of the stuff we run through the systems is trashed within six months.”

Response #1:
These statistics amazed me. The fact that in the amount of time that I have lived on this planet, we ourselves have used up one-third of the worlds’ natural resources. There should always be distributive justice and everyone needs to find a way to better work together so that these numbers do not increase. The problem most of the time is that even though we know right from wrong, and are well aware that we are quickly destroying our finite planet, we some how think that we “ourselves” are the exception. We automatically do not think we could be the ones contributing to the problem. If everyone just faced the fact that each and every individuals role in society has an impact, then maybe we will have a better grasp on how to save our planet.

Actual Text #2: Three steps to change: Identify the heart of the problem, the big idea. Then realize you all have to work together to accomplish this goal. Lastly, take action. “Faith is taking the first step even though you do not see the whole staircase."

Response #2: Many things seem beyond our control, but the problem we all have is that we know what is wrong, we know we have to work together to fix it, but we never exactly find the courage to take action. That third step may be the scariest because that means you have to change the structure of things and polices but we do not make improvement in life without having a little bravery that with our help we can make change. I have noted this before, but I truly think this is a great quote. “ You know, sometimes all you need is 20 seconds of insane courage. Just literally 20 seconds of just embarrassing bravery. And I promise you; something great will come of it. If people like Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King, Oscar Romero and Abraham Lincoln, can find it in them to make change happen, I think we can find a way to get together and back them. They risked everything for us and this world will not survive much longer if we don't find those 20 seconds to have courage.

Write comment now Authorin: sgostiguy Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:49 am
20
October
2013

The Story of Stuff & The Story of Change

“The Story of Stuff” had a ton of information about consumer product supply chain and the impact a consumer society has on the environment and its people. One of the most interesting things that Annie Leonard said was American consumers no longer use or own 99% of their purchased products 6 months after purchase. This concept isn’t expanded further, but I’m fairly sure it has to include things like food packaging – even still, 99% of all purchased material is an alarming rate.

This was not the first time I’ve heard the terms “planned obsolescence” and “perceived obsolescence” but “The Story of Stuff” gave it a new perspective. The idea that planned obsolescence was a conscious decision, and that it correlates to the time when American unhappiness began to decline, says a lot about our value system. Even if we think we want stuff, we don’t need things, stuff doesn’t actually bring happiness. The visualization of the treadmill/cycle of tired from work, watch TV, TV tells us to buy, need to work to buy, return to work to make money, get tired from work… etc… illustrated this point perfectly.

I decided to watch “The Story of Change” after finishing “The Story of Stuff.” I loved the idea presented in this video that we can’t just encourage people to do the right thing, because it’s often hard to do the right thing. The right item to buy might be a lot more expensive, so people without the means will be stuck funding a product that damages people, or the environment, or themselves. Instead, the video suggest we have to change the economy so the right thing is the easy thing. When the right choice is easy for consumers to make, the easy to buy product becomes second nature.

Another concept I took from “The Story of Change” was the idea that people can use what they’re good at and apply it to being a “change maker.” Not everyone has time to stand around demonstrating, or the know-how to create a Fair Trade company, for example. Instead, people can take their own talents and apply them to creating the world they want to live in.

Write comment now Authorin: Stacie Schwartz Sun Oct 20, 2013 8:47 am
16
October
2013

Dollars and Sense Dignity

Text 1: "I want to share with you how I came to this hopeful perspective and my mission to help provide low-cost, high quality assisted living solutions for seniors."

Response 1: The author opened with this powerful saying. She describes her work as hopeful and claims that was she does is her mission, not just her job. This opening sets the tone for the rest of the passage, allowing the reader to identify with the emotional perspective the author conveys, rather than reading the passage as if the author were talking merely about her job. Conchy Bretos, the author of this passage, expresses her hope in the senior care living business, yet admits that she was not always as positive. She exemplifies the power of doing good by making a career out of her passion of fairness.

Text 2: "Before our model, residents of public and subsidized housing were evicted from their units when they could no longer live independently."

Response 2: Before Mia Senior Living Solutions many elderly people were evicted simply because they were not physically able to take care of their properties. These people were forced to move into expensive and depressing nursing homes, or would have to become homeless. Mia provides a solution by allowing the elderly to remain in the comfort of their homes by bringing care to them. Mia Living Solutions accomplishes the never ending quest of saving the government money as well as creating and maintaining safe and comfortable places for the elderly to live. Mia is both fair and nurturing to its customers while simultaneously conducting a profitable business. Other business should consider following a path similar to that of Mia Living Solutions.

Write comment now Authorin: hshort2 Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:49 am
16
October
2013

Week 6: Dollars, Sense and Dignity

Quote #1: "CBS news presented the case for my work extremely well. The research showed that, for every person we provide services, we were saving the Medicaid budget $18,000 per year."

Response to #1: I am definitely much more motivated by practicality, and this article did a very good job convincing me that Mia would be more cost-efficient. It is a topic that everyone thinks of. Many people have older relatives that they would like to see in good living situations, or they think of their parents, or even themselves when they get older. It's certainly a topic that interests many, especially since the government takes money out of our paychecks for Social Security. Being able to see Bloomberg, CBS, etc. and some numbers made me feel more reassured that this idea could actually work.

Quote #2: "The public also mistrusts corporate America.The good news about this has been an increased motivation on the part of corporations to engage with social service organizations and show their commitment toward the communities in which they operate."

Response to #2: For some reason, I'm really in love with this quote. It is very truthful. Most people would agree that they don't trust corporate America. In fact, 99% of our Fair Trade would certainly agree with this because of all that is written about unfair wages and practices and that the CEOs make absurd amounts of money. But I really like that this author didn't try to say that huge corporations were good, but merely pointed out that there is a positive spin. Many companies do give a lot to charity and hold and sponsor events. Maybe the intention is public relations, and is not genuine, but intention doesn't matter much in the big picture if people are being helped.

Write comment now Authorin: smurray Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:34 am
Blog Categories
Stay up to date!
Like this Blog
Most active Bloggers
Page 6 of 14 « previous Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 14 next Page »
EMPI-Fordham
Visitors
0 Members and 1 Guest are online.

We welcome our newest member: Henry Miller
guest counter
Today were 3 (yesterday 46) guests online.

Board Statistics
The forum has 13 topics and 34 posts.

0 members have been online today:


Visitor record: 20 users on Sun Jan 02, 2022 6:27 am..